Throughout American history there has been wars and protest against wars that has cause people to take stance for one side or another. The worst war is the war that is fought in our own back yards. The struggle of our streets, the struggle a mother has when her son "chases waterfalls" over a cliff destroying his life. Probably the most Unholy war of them all is the one that comes when a loved one is drugged into the infintry because of so called fidelity.
I propose the question is this situation worth it. Can a lover allow him or herself to become destroyed simply she wants to stand by her man or he wants to stand by his woman? I guess the answer depends on the situation. I would say that in most situations the answer would be yes. Love is the ultimate factor is this situation but if it is there then not only do I think that one should be devoted to stand by their lover but I think that is ought to be an obligation of that person to follow and support even until death.
Society would be better for this because it would bring about a sense of loyalty and commitment and unconditional love that i believe that has always lacked in teh world. Ideally if everyone was that committed to the people in their lives (i.e husband/wife, boyfriend/girlfriend, brother/sister father/son) then there would be no need for wars in the streets because everyone would have a sense of love and support which the lack of these values are , arguably, the root of gangs and gang violence in the world.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree...if everyone focused on the people they supposedly love then there would be no issues concerning love. It would end drama that involves trust issues and it would help relationships thrive.
ReplyDeleteBut what about domestic violence between husband and wife, girlfriend and girlfriend, etc.? Cant that be seen as another "unholy war" as well? Where in that case, should the person stick by their significant other?
ReplyDelete